Archive | Brain RSS feed for this section

Our Exponential Future

17 Jul

About 1260 AD, Ibn Khallikan, a Kurdish historian living in the Abbasid Empire (modern Iraq), wrote an encyclopedia with biographies of many famous men (though no women). One of the biographies includes a story about chess and the meaning of “exponential growth.” The story takes place in India, because Ibn Khallikan knew that chess was a game that came from India.

According to this story, King Shihram was a tyrant who oppressed his subjects. One of his subjects, a wise man named Sissa ibn Dahir, invented the game of chess for the king to play, to show him that a king needed all his subjects and should take good care of them. King Shihram was so pleased that he ordered that the game of chess should be preserved in the temples, and said that it was the best thing he knew of to train generals in the art of war, a glory to religion and the world, and the foundation of all justice.

Then King Shihram asked Sissa ben Dahir what reward he wanted. Sissa answered that he didn’t want any reward, but the king insisted. Finally Sissa said that he would take this reward: the king should put one grain of wheat on the first square of a chessboard, two grains of wheat on the second square, four grains on the third square, eight grains on the fourth square, and so on, doubling the number of grains of wheat with each square (an exponential rate of growth).

“What a dummy!” thought the king. “That’s a tiny reward; I would have given him much more.” He ordered his slaves

to bring out the chessboard and they started putting on the wheat. Everything went well for a while, but the king was surprised to see that by the time they got halfway through the chessboard the 32nd square required more than four billion grains of wheat, or about 100,000 kilos of wheat. Now Sissa didn’t seem so stupid anymore. Even so, King Shihram was willing to pay up.

But as the slaves began on the second half of the chessboard, King Shihram gradually realized that he couldn’t pay that much wheat – in fact, to finish the chessboard you would need as much wheat as six times the weight of all the living things on Earth.

(London, 1843-1871, Biographical dictionary of Ibn Khallikan, vol. III, p. 71). – Kidipedea

One big risk for humans is that we may not always precieve the world correctly. We live in a world that can change exponentially with brains that like to plot things out linearly.

In other words, we do a bad job at perceiving reality in some cases. (It is no secret to those of us interested in cognitive science know that humans minds are flawed. Here is a list of cognitive biases if you want to peruse a few. We have a habit of perceiving things that are not true.)

The theory I propose that can cause us problems in the future: Humans seem to think (and plan) in a linear growth fashion while reality can be exponential.

So, we seem to have problems getting our minds around exponential behaviors. They can sneak up on us, like in the old story above. For example, energy usage, population growth, and consumption of resources are all growing at an exponential rate.  Exponential depletion of resources combined with exponential consumption layered on top of exponential population growth appears to be the reality we are moving into at this point.

Let’s take a look at a population graph of the world since 10,000 BC. This is an exponential graph. Once you get on the right side of one of these things, it can start going almost straight up at this scale.

550px-population_curvesvgFrom Wikipedia

Combine a population that is growing exponentially, combined successful populations of people moving out of poverty to become ever more consumption oriented – and you could perhaps have a problem at some point.

Our history plotted on this population chart has been one where growth and consumption has been the goal throughout history – and man has not had an issue because the finite amount of total resources was so much larger than the population’s demands. But, I think there has to be a point where exponentially depleted resources meet exponentially growing demand, and we have an issue. We would at that point meet a new paradigm that we have never encountered before. So, the future over the next 20 years could be much different than the last 20.

On the positive side, we can make progress at an exponential rate. Ray Kurzweil, futurist, technologist, and all around genius predicts exponential growth in certain information technologies, which can allow us to survive and thrive. For example, he believes that solar energy is improving at an exponential rate and will be capable of providing all of our energy needs in 20 years.

The reason why solar energy technologies will advance exponentially, Kurzweil said, is because it is an “information technology” (one for which we can measure the information content), and thereby subject to the Law of Accelerating Returns.

“We also see an exponential progression in the use of solar energy,” he said. “It is doubling now every two years. Doubling every two years means multiplying by 1,000 in 20 years. At that rate we’ll meet 100 percent of our energy needs in 20 years.”

Solar Power to Rule in 20 Years, Futurists Say

So, what what topics should be paid attention to in order to understand the future? I recommend 4 words that start with “E”: Energy, Environment, Economics, and last but not least… Exponential growth.

Wheelchair Controlled By The Brain

4 May

The University of Zaragoza in Spain has developed and built a brain-controlled wheelchair.  The wheelchair is controlled using an EEG cap worn on the head.  Along with using a P300 neurophysiological protocol and automated navigation.  They have successfully tested this on five different participants.  This is truly amazing technology.

How Color Impacts Your Thinking

7 Feb
Picture 7.png

The NY Times posted the results of some interesting research into how color impacts cognition. The bottom line is, if you want to boost your attention to detail, surround yourself with red, and if you want to boost creativity, then blue is your color.

Red groups did better on tests of recall and attention to detail, like remembering words or checking spelling and punctuation. Blue groups did better on tests requiring imagination, like inventing creative uses for a brick or creating toys from shapes.

Link: Color Study Looks at Effects of Red and Blue – NYTimes.com

So, I suppose that creating blue rooms at work for the creatives and red for the accountants would be a good idea.

When Dr. Zhu’s subjects were asked what red or blue made them think of, most said that red represented caution, danger or mistakes, and that blue symbolized peace and openness. Subjects were quicker to unscramble anagrams of “avoidance related” words like “danger” when the anagrams were on red backgrounds, and quicker with anagrams of positive, “approach related” words like “adventure” when they were on blue backgrounds.

Mind Reading

4 Jan

picture-3This was a really interesting piece  that was just on 60 minutes concerning the latest in neuro-technology research. fMRI – functional MRI technology is starting to be able to identify thoughts.

Neuroscience has learned much about the brain’s activity and its link to certain thoughts. As Lesley Stahl reports, it may now be possible, on a basic level, to read a person’s mind.

Check it out…

Watch CBS Videos Online

Pretty cool, I have covered improvements in mind-computer interfaces on Tomorrow’s Trends for a while. Most recently, there was a post on additional mind-blowing neuro-tech concerning  “The Dream Machine”.

Brain controlled computer games

16 Apr

The technology behind interpreting brainwaves and using this information to interact with computers is getting better. There are all type of applications, but games is where it will probably start – then the interface can be adapted to all types of computer and medical applications.
Below is a video discussing and demonstrating Emotiv’s new brain interface.

Here is an article in Scientific American on this device.

Your brain may trigger your decisions before you make them

14 Apr

These experiments show that the brain makes decisions prior to you being aware you made a decision. This is something to mull over a while, and is a little unsettling. Basically, this could indicate that the concept that your behavior is based on your active decision-making is in incorrect. Your brain may decide your behavior, and your active decision-making is an illusion of your brain.

Brain Scanners Can See Your Decisions Before You Make Them: “You may think you decided to read this story — but in fact, your brain made the decision long before you knew about it.

In a study published Sunday in Nature Neuroscience, researchers using brain scanners could predict people’s decisions seven seconds before the test subjects were even aware of making them.

The decision studied — whether to hit a button with one’s left or right hand — may not be representative of complicated choices that are more integrally tied to our sense of self-direction. Regardless, the findings raise profound questions about the nature of self and autonomy: How free is our will? Is conscious choice just an illusion?

‘Your decisions are strongly prepared by brain activity. By the time consciousness kicks in, most of the work has already been done,’ said study co-author John-Dylan Haynes, a Max Planck Institute neuroscientist.”

Visual Cognition

26 Mar

How well does your brain allow you to pay attention? Check out this commercial.

The University of Illinois has a

whole set of videos that have additional examples of different scenarios.

Voiceless Communication

13 Mar

Basically it looks like Texas Instruments has created a device that picks up information traveling from the brain to the vocal chords and interperets that vocal data. So, even without actually speaking, when you think about talking- it picks up the what you want to say and translates that into actual speech. This could be a very compelling computer interface method as well- where you could “think” and ask a question of Google, for example.

The secret to raising a successful kid

26 Feb

brain2.jpgAccording to research, focusing on natural intellect and talent is not the best way to raise a successful kid. The secret is to focus on effort, moving forward, and not giving up. They call it a “growth mindset” – meaning persistence.

The Secret to Raising Smart Kids: Scientific American: “# Many people assume that superior intelligence or ability is a key to success. But more than three decades of research shows that an overemphasis on intellect or talent‚Äîand the implication that such traits are innate and fixed‚Äîleaves people vulnerable to failure, fearful of challenges and unmotivated to learn.
# Teaching people to have a ‘growth mind-set,’ which encourages a focus on effort rather than on intelligence or talent, produces high achievers in school and in life.
# Parents and teachers can engender a growth mind-set in children by praising them for their effort or persistence (rather than for their intelligence), by telling success stories that emphasize hard work and love of learning, and by teaching them about the brain as a learning machine.”

Interesting Links

22 Sep